Pedestrians often rely on safety measures such as high-visibility clothing to stand out, especially at night. But what if those same clothes confuse the very technology designed to protect them? A new study from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) suggests that some pedestrian automatic emergency braking (AEB) systems struggle to detect people wearing reflective gear. This raises serious concerns about how well these systems work in real-world conditions, particularly in low-light situations where most fatal pedestrian accidents happen.
Why do automated crash prevention systems struggle with pedestrian detection?
AEB systems are supposed to act as a second set of eyes for drivers. They use cameras and sensors to spot pedestrians and apply the brakes if a crash is imminent. In theory, this technology should reduce pedestrian crashes, and past studies show that AEB systems lower pedestrian crashes by about 27%. But when it comes to night driving, their effectiveness drops sharply.
The problem is that AEB systems don’t "see" pedestrians the way human drivers do. They rely on algorithms to recognize patterns and shapes rather than contrast or reflective surfaces. That’s why researchers wanted to know how these systems react to different types of clothing and lighting. Their findings suggest that what makes pedestrians more visible to humans can actually make them harder for AEB systems to detect.
How does pedestrian clothing impact AEB performance?
To test AEB effectiveness, IIHS researchers examined three 2023 vehicle models: the Honda CR-V, Mazda CX-5, and Subaru Forester. They used an adult-sized dummy dressed in different outfits to see how well the vehicles recognized and responded to a pedestrian under various lighting conditions. The dummy wore:
- All black: A black sweatshirt and pants
- A reflective jacket: A high-visibility jacket with black sweatpants
- Reflective strips: A black sweatshirt and pants with retroreflective strips on the limbs
- All white: A white sweatshirt and pants
The idea was to see if brightly colored or reflective clothing helps human drivers notice pedestrians and improves AEB performance. The results were unexpected.
How did different clothing types affect vehicle response?
For human drivers, reflective clothing and bright colors make pedestrians stand out. However, the AEB systems in the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-5 struggled the most when the dummy wore reflective strips, which would normally increase visibility. Neither vehicle slowed down at all in these tests, which suggests their sensors didn’t recognize the motion of the strips as human movement.
In contrast, both vehicles responded better when the dummy was dressed in all black, but only when their high beams were on. With low beams in complete darkness, the Honda CR-V failed to slow at all, while the Mazda CX-5 barely reduced speed. Adding more roadway lighting improved detection slightly, but the results were inconsistent.
However, the Subaru Forester was the standout performer. It avoided a collision in nearly every test, only failing once when the dummy wore reflective strips and there was moderate (10 lux) lighting. Even in that case, it slowed down significantly before impact.
How does lighting affect AEB performance?
Since most fatal pedestrian crashes happen at night, researchers tested the vehicles under three different lighting conditions:
- No additional roadway lighting: The only light came from the vehicle’s headlights.
- 10 lux of added light: Equivalent to a dimly lit sidewalk.
- 20 lux of added light: The federally recommended brightness for crosswalks.
The CR-V and CX-5 performed better when there was more light, but even then, their responses were inconsistent. The CR-V did best when the dummy wore white clothing with added light. But strangely, it slowed more at 10 lux than at 20 lux. The CX-5 responded well to the reflective jacket at 10 lux but performed worse when there was more light. The Subaru Forester was the most reliable. It stopped for the pedestrian dummy in nearly all conditions.
What do these findings mean for pedestrian safety?
The study sheds light on a troubling issue: AEB systems don’t always recognize people wearing the very clothing meant to keep them safe. Roadway workers, emergency responders, and other professionals rely on high-visibility gear to stand out, but if AEB technology can’t detect them, they remain at risk.
This is more than just a technical glitch; it’s a serious safety concern. Automakers need to refine their AEB systems so that reflective clothing doesn't interfere with pedestrian detection. If these systems are going to prevent crashes, they must work in real-world conditions, not just controlled test environments.
What legal options do I have if I'm injured in a pedestrian accident in Indiana?
A pedestrian accident can turn your life upside down. Medical bills pile up, lost wages put a strain on your finances, and the pain from your injuries can feel overwhelming. If a careless driver hit you, you have the right to take legal action. In Indiana, the at-fault party is responsible for covering the damages. That means you may be able to file a claim against the driver, their insurance company, or even a business that overserved a drunk driver who caused your crash. If you lost a loved one in a pedestrian accident, your family may have the right to file a wrongful death lawsuit.
However, insurance companies don't have your best interests in mind. They'll likely try to shift the blame onto you or use every trick to keep you from recovering the full amount of compensation you're entitled to. That's where an experienced Indiana pedestrian accident lawyer at Glaser & Ebbs comes in. We have over 100 years of combined experience fighting for injury victims and holding negligent parties accountable.
We offer a free consultation so you can ask questions, decide if we're the right fit for your case, and learn about your legal options. To get started, contact us today to schedule your free, no-obligation consultation.
“In my opinion by far the best personal injury law firm in the area. Highly competent, aggressive, and gets things done. I highly recommend this firm to anyone who needs top-flight attorneys. They definitely care about their clients!” - M.P., ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐